Comparison
Why Krush?
Two comparisons. First, the category: the traditional round grinder against the Krush square form factor. Then, the range itself.
Traditional round grinder vs Krush.
Category
Traditional round grinder
Krush
Form factor
Circular — the inherited industry default
Square, 55 mm × 55 mm footprint (catalogue verified)
Design intent
Varies by manufacturer
Form factor deliberately reconsidered: “reinvented the wheel by making the form factor square”
Shred
Varies by manufacturer
Medium shred specified for KUBE 2.0 and KUBE 3.0
Dish capacity
Varies by manufacturer
2.5 g (2.0 / 3.0) · 4.20 g (2.0 XL)
Ergonomics
Round bodies roll on flat surfaces
Flat faces and defined corners sit still and stack
Mass / hand feel
Varies by manufacturer
175 g (2.0) · 300 g (2.0 XL) · 185 g (3.0)
IP position
Varies by manufacturer
Several issued patents plus EU community designs (catalogue stated)
Retail footprint
Varies by manufacturer
Featured in over 500 European retail stores; Europe, North America, Oceania
Quality process
Varies by manufacturer
Batch testing, proprietary track-and-trace, full REACH compliance
Round-grinder columns describe the category generally and vary by manufacturer. Krush makes no claim that every round grinder performs poorly. Comparative performance testing: requires validation.
KUBE 2.0 vs 2.0 XL vs 3.0.
| Specification | KUBE 2.0 | KUBE 2.0 XL | KUBE 3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60.00 CAD | $90.00 CAD | $90.00 CAD |
| Dish capacity | 2.5 g | 4.20 g | 2.5 g |
| Weight | 175 g | 300 g | 185 g |
| Size | 55 × 55 × 34 mm | REQUIRES VALIDATION | 55 × 55 × 46 mm |
| Shred | Medium | REQUIRES VALIDATION | Medium |
| Colour | Black | Black | Black |
| Best for | Daily carry | Sessions & sharing | The collector's format |
| Shop | View | View | View |
Find your Krush
Which Krush is right for you?
Step 1 / 3