Comparison
Why Krush?
Two comparisons. First, the category: the traditional round grinder against the Krush square form factor. Then, the range itself.
Traditional round grinder vs Krush.
Category
Traditional round grinder
Krush
Form factor
Circular — the inherited industry default
Square, 55 mm × 55 mm footprint (catalogue verified)
Design intent
Varies by manufacturer
Form factor deliberately reconsidered: “reinvented the wheel by making the form factor square”
Shred
Varies by manufacturer
Medium shred across KUBE 2.0, 2.0 XL and 3.0
Dish capacity
Varies by manufacturer
2.5 g (2.0 / 3.0) · 4.20 g (2.0 XL)
Ergonomics
Round bodies roll on flat surfaces
Flat faces and defined corners sit still and stack
Mass / hand feel
Varies by manufacturer
175 g (2.0) · 300 g (2.0 XL) · 185 g (3.0)
IP position
Varies by manufacturer
Several issued patents plus EU community designs (catalogue stated)
Retail footprint
Varies by manufacturer
Retailers in Europe, North America, Oceania
Quality process
Varies by manufacturer
Batch testing, proprietary track-and-trace, full REACH compliance
Round-grinder columns describe the category generally and vary by manufacturer. Krush makes no claim that every round grinder performs poorly. Comparative performance testing: requires validation.
KUBE 2.0 vs 2.0 XL vs 3.0.
| Specification | KUBE 2.0 | KUBE 2.0 XL | KUBE 3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 CAD | $99 CAD | $99 CAD |
| Dish capacity | 2.5 g | 4.20 g | 2.5 g |
| Weight | 175 g | 300 g | 185 g |
| Size | 55 × 55 × 34 mm | 75 × 75 × 34 mm | 55 × 55 × 46 mm |
| Shred | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Colour | Future Dusk, Emerald Green, Black, Grey, Rose Gold | Future Dusk, Emerald Green, Black, Grey, Rose Gold | Future Dusk, Emerald Green, Black, Grey, Rose Gold |
| Best for | Daily carry | Sessions & sharing | The collector's format |
| Shop | View | View | View |
Find your Krush
Which Krush is right for you?
Step 1 / 3